COM.on C.A.1:e4/22-27       Online published on May 27, 2007.
doi:10.4236/coca.2007.11004

ARGUMENT
Native Americans or Chinese Migrants: on the Origin of Olmec Civilization in Mesoamerica
SHEN Guolin
Communication Department, Journalism School, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433 China;
The Fox International Fellowships, Center for International and Area Studies, Yale University, New Haven CT06511 USA

 

ABSTRACT: This article focuses on the controversy that transpacific diffusion from Shang dynasty was responsible for the rise of Olmec civilization. Some scholars who presented the hypothesis featured the evidence including the time, pictographs, symbols, jade carving, and images to illustrate that Shang stimulated or redirected the development of early agricultural societies in Mesoamerica. However, the evidence collected was contradicted by opponents to elucidate the way of indigenous development of civilization in Mesoamerica. The argument suggests there is not enough evidence to support that writing system of Olmec was originated from Shang. The main problem of the Bronze Age China-Mesoamerica connection is the absence of the hallmark technology of China, Bronze, in Mesoamerica. Here we suggest that a few Shang people have possibly fled to American without superstructure of the society. In that case, writing, arts, and other technologies could not be introduced, and developed again later based on the memory of the Shang civilization, which can explain the similarity and inconsistency between Olmec and Shang civilizations. There is no last word on Shang origin of Olmec civilization and further data and evidence should be accumulated to prove or deny the hypothesis.

Key words: Olmec civilization; Chinese Origin; Comparative semeiology; Mesoamerica

Received: May 14, 2007   Accepted: May 24, 2007   Corresponding: vincentshen@hotmail.com


《现代人类学通讯》第一卷e4篇 第22-27页 2007年5月27日网上发行
热点争议
殷人东渡,还是源起美洲——中美洲奥梅克文明的起源之争
沈国麟
复旦大学新闻学院传播学系,上海200433; 耶鲁大学国际区域研究中心福克斯国际交流计划,美国 康州 新港06511

摘要:在考古学界对于中美洲奥梅克文明的起源有许多争论,本文回顾了其中的一个争论,即奥梅克文明是否是中国殷商时代的难民东渡美洲建立的。同意殷人东渡假说的学者从文明的起止时间、文字、雕像、玉器等证据出发,认为奥梅克文明很有可能来源于中国殷商,而反对殷人东渡假说的学者则从以上论据一一反驳,认为奥梅克文明直接起源于美洲本土。例如文字系统并不能是充分的证据,奥梅克文明缺乏殷商文明的标志性技术——铸铜技术。本文认为如果有少量的殷商难民东渡,因为上层建筑的丢失,可能并没有能够携带完整的文字、艺术和其它技术。但是在原有的殷商文明的记忆影响下,文字和其它技术重新发生,可能解释两种文明之间的相似性和不一致性。殷人东渡美洲的假说需要更多的出土文物和统计分析来论证或者证伪。
关键词:奥梅克文明;殷人东渡;文字比较;中美洲
收稿日期:2007年5月14日 修回日期:2007年5月24日 联系人:沈国麟 vincentshen@hotmail.com

全文链接 Full text: [PDF]

参考文献 References
1. Wilford JN (2005) Mother Culture, or Only a Sister? The New York Times. Section F, p1. [link]
2. Xu HM (2002) New Evidence From Tabasco for a Possible Trans-Pacific Influence. New England Antiguities Research Association's Fall Conference, Across Before Columbus, Plus Ten: 1992- 2002, New Evidence & Latest Research, On Early Contacts with the Americas. Four Points Sheraton, Waltham, Massachusetts.  [link]
3. McNeill WH (1963) The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp240-242.
4. Coe MD (1968) America's first civilization. Princeton,NJ: American Heritage. pp126-127.
5. Meggers B (1975) The Transpacific Origin of Mesoamerican Civilization. American Anthropologist. 77:1-27. [link]
6. Xu HM (2006)The Chinese Connection: How Bronze Age Chinese May have inspired the Olmec Civilization of Mexico. Fantastic Archaeology, ANTH/CF 3334,Fall Semester. [pdf]
7. Xu HM (1996) Origin of the Olmec Civilization. University of Central Oklahoma Press.
8. Martínez MCR, Ceballos PO, Coe MD, Diehl RA, Houston SD, Taube KA, Calderón AD (2006) Oldest Writing in the New World. Science 313:1610-1614. [link]
9. Grove DC (1976) Olmec Origins and Transpacific Diffusion: Reply to Meggers. American Anthropologist 78:634 – 637. [link]
10. Cyphers A (1997) Población, Subsistencia y Medio Ambiente en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, pp255-274.
11. Jeffrey P (2005) Blomster’s response to Betty J. Meggers’ letter, Science 309: 556. [link]